Saturday, August 22, 2020

The Various Versions of the Bible - Does it matter which one I read?


I’ve been shocked to find how many actually think there is nothing wrong with reading other versions of the Bible such as NIV, RSV, ESV, MSG, etc. 

NIV = New International Version
RSV = Revised Standard Version
ESV = English Standard Version
MSG = The Message Bible

It used to be common and held firmly by most all denominations that the KJV was the closest to the original, but over the years, that belief has diminished as more and more people (even within our own denomination) embrace, read, and own different versions of what is supposed to be the Bible. 

Now, the tide has turned where many will question why a person still reads or owns the King James Version instead of the other way around and scoff at those who do. 

The question many have today is ‘does it really matter which version I read?’ and some will use the reasoning of ‘I can’t understand the KJV so I read these other versions because it’s easier to understand.’

Today, we’re going to examine some comparative Scriptures to see whether it really does matter or not and address some of the reasons given.

 

How did the King James Version of the Bible come into existence?

In 1604, soon after King James’ coronation as King of England, a conference of churchmen requested that the English Bible be revised because existing translations ‘were corrupt and not answerable to the truth of the original.’

King James set about to have 47 scholars organized into six companies which were then divided again with 2 of each of those groups working at Westminster, Oxford, and Cambridge on sections of the Bible assigned to them.

An elaborate set of rules was contrived to deter individuals from translating the Scriptures with a bias slant toward what they believed or leaned toward even if that’s not what the Scripture said or meant.

They wanted to preserve the translation’s scholarly and nonpartisan character and keep it as faithful to the original languages of the Bible than previous translations.

The new Bible was completed and published in 1611 and was widely accepted for centuries until people began to look at it as antiquated/outdated and turned toward more modern versions beginning in 1952 (RSV), 1978 (NIV), 1989 (NRSV).


“I’ve tried to read the KJV but I can’t understand it.”

The Scripture tells us that the ‘natural man’ cannot understand spiritual things.

1 Corinthians 2:14
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God:
for they are foolishness unto him:
neither can he know them (which means: be aware, understand),
because they are spiritually discerned.

The carnal, natural man will have trouble understanding what God’s Word is saying.  That’s why the Bible says we must be born again.

John 3:3, 7
Except a man be born again, he cannot see the Kingdom of God.
…Ye must be born again.

 

When you’re born again, God’s Spirit will be living within you.  That Spirit will guide a person into all Truth.

John 16:13
Howbeit, when He, the Spirit of Truth is come,
He will guide you into all Truth….

Luke 24:45
Then opened He their understanding,
that they might understand the Scriptures.

God’s Spirit will help us to understand the Word of God if we go to it with an open heart and ask Him to open our understanding.

Most Americans would find it difficult to understand the Chinese language.  However, a child who is born into a Chinese family would be able to understand every word. 

When you are born again of water and Spirit, the Bible will begin to make sense. It doesn’t happen overnight but over time in the same way that a baby slowly learns to understand what their mommy and daddy are saying because you will have the Holy Ghost inside teaching and guiding you into all Truth.


The other versions are easier to understand

Possibly, some important questions to ask and examine are….

* Are they interpreted correctly? 
* Are they omitting important words or phrases?
* Do they change the meaning of the Scripture?

Lately, it seems I’m seeing more and more Scriptures posted from other versions.  It usually peaks my interest because I had never seen (whatever Scripture) from that particular view before so I’ll quickly go look it up in my Bible. 

Time and again, I’ve been shocked and saddened that the meaning has been either somewhat changed or completely changed.

A while back I saw a post on Facebook concerning Jeremiah 9:2 from the Message Bible.  People were having fun with it and it intrigued me because as many times as I had read the Bible, I didn’t recall seeing a Scripture with that inference.

Jeremiah 9:2 MSG
At times I wish I had a wilderness hut,
A backwoods cabin,
Where I could get away from my people
and never see them again.
They’re a faithless, feckless bunch,
a congregation of degenerates.

Jeremiah 9:2 KJV
Oh that I had in the wilderness
a lodging place of wayfaring men;
that I might leave my people,
and go from them!
for they be all adulterers,
an assembly of treacherous men.

HUGE difference!

But wait! - I thought the point of these other versions was to make it easier to read and understand? 

Feckless?!?  Who actually uses that word and what does it mean?  Feckless means: lacking initiative or strength of character; irresponsible.

There is a HUGE difference between the meanings of faithless/feckless and adulterers/treacherous! 

The MSG version changed the entire meaning of that Scripture and watered down the outcry and outrage that God Himself was feeling against His own people. 

Israel was more than just a faithless and irresponsible people; they were an assembly of deceitful people who were committing spiritual adultery against their God.

 

What about NIV, ESV, and some of the other versions?

Jesus is the only one referred to as the Day Star


2 Peter 1:19
…until the day dawn, 
and the day star 
arise in your hearts.

 

Yet we find the ESV and ISV have changed the word ‘lucifer’ for ‘Day star’

The creator of this comparative makes a good point….
How can you trust a ‘Bible’ that misses the distinction between Jesus and lucifer?

 

Let’s look at a comparative of Daniel 3:25  KJV vs. NIV

Daniel 3:25 KJV
Lo, I see four men loose,
walking in the midst of the fire,
and they have no hurt;
and the form of the fourth
is like the Son of God.

Daniel 3:25 NIV
Look! I see four men
walking around in the fire,
unbound and unharmed,
and the fourth
looks like a son of the gods.

 

A comparative between Genesis 3:16 KJV vs. ESV

There is a difference between a woman’s desire/longings to be toward her husband and for a woman’s desires/longings to be contrary to her husband.

While it is true that a husband and wife may not always see things eye to eye and may be opposite to each other, that is NOT what GOD said. 


Comparative between KJV and NIV using Luke 9:56 and Matthew 18:11

Notice the NIV left out an important point mentioned in the KJV in Luke 9:56…

 

Jesus came to save lives, not destroy them!

 

…and it completely omitted the verse of Matthew 18:11 which reveals the whole reason why Jesus came!

 

WHY? Significant changes had to happen in order for the version/perversion to obtain a copyright in 1973. 


Notice the other versions left out WHO or WHAT we’re to believe on.

Many believe but what do they believe in? and who do they believe in?

The KJV let’s us know we are to believe on JESUS!

 

False doctrines and theologies are created when Scriptures are changed!

Philippians 2:5-6  KJV vs ESV is a prime example of that….


1 Timothy 3:16 KJV 

And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness. 
GOD was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, 
seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, 
believed on in the world, received up into glory.


1 Timothy 3:16 ESV
Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: 
He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, 
seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, 
believed on in the world, taken up in glory.

Reading both of these Scriptures (Phil 2:5-6 + 1 Tim 3:16) in the KJV, we understand and see that the fullness of the Godhead dwells in Christ Jesus bodily and that He was manifest in the flesh.  But the ESV has changed the meaning of Scripture by implying Jesus is less than God.

There’s also a difference between saying He was received up INTO glory and that He was taken up IN glory.

The ESV is a revised version of the RSV which is already a ‘revised standard version’. 

 

Most other versions omit an important part of this verse….

ROMANS 8:1 KJV– There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit.

NLT, NIV, ESV, RSV, NASB, CSB just to name a few omit the last phrase of this verse….there is no condemnation to those who WALK NOT AFTER THE FLESH BUT AFTER THE SPIRIT. 

Denying your flesh and following after the Will and Way of the Spirit is a key part in our walk with God!

 

NIV vs KJV Mark 9:46 - Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.

NIV completely omits the verse explaining the agony and torture of hell.  Omitting it is not going to make it go away or make the reality of eternity less real.


Copyright versus No Copyright

Why are there such drastic changes and omission to these Scriptures? – the KJV does NOT have a copyright while the ESV and other versions DO.  Significant changes had to be made in these various versions of the Scripture in order to obtain copyrights.

If the Bible is God’s letters to us, then why would and how could someone copyright the Word of God?

The King James Version is an English translation of the Bible which was translated for the Church of England.  It was commissioned under the sponsorship of King James VI in 1603 and completed as well as published in 1611.

The Old Testament was translated from the Hebrew and Aramaic in which it was originally written and the New Testament was translated from the Greek in which is was originally written (for that was the universal language used during that time when the N.T. was written).

The KJV has been used and accepted since 1611, so why the need to change now?

 

Changing just one word can change the whole idea!

Some would reason that the KJV language is outdated.  Perhaps the ‘thee’s’ and ‘thou’s’ are, however we can understand what it’s meaning.  Students are made to study Shakespeare in school because his literature is considered ‘classics’ so why feel the Bible is outdated and needs to be updated and changed?

The change in wording is also bringing about a change in understanding of Scripture and creating false doctrine.

The devil is so clever to mix Truth with a little bit of lie in order to twist Truth and deceive just as he did to Eve in the Garden of Eden. 

Counterfeits!
The other versions are made to look real, they’ll have some Truth within, but they were created to deceive and lead people astray into false doctrine.

These other versions omit important words, verses, and topics such as: hell, blood, and repent.


The ESV is actually another translation from the RSV, which was denounced by elder men of God who recognized that the translators of the Revised Standard Version were actually modernistic and liberalistic scholars who do not believe or embrace the revealed truths of God’s Holy Word, including the plan of salvation.

We need to be careful who’s counsel we’re receiving. (Psalm 1:1)

Changes to the Bible lead to the creation of false doctrines and open a person up to receiving a spirit of error.

1 John 4:6
We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us;
he that is not of God heareth not us.
Hereby know we the Spirit of Truth,
and the spirit of error.